As part of our ongoing contribution to the NDIS Review, the APS was pleased to share the experience of members in our response to the NDIS Quality and Safeguarding Framework Issues Paper.
Our submission agreed that the NDIS Quality and Safeguarding Framework, which was developed in 2016, needs updating. The Framework has not been successful in its objectives of promoting high-quality and safe NDIS services. Instead, the Framework has led to the creation of a burdensome and punitive regulatory environment for NDIS providers, including psychologists. In addition, the Framework does not recognise or value the expertise and competence of high-performing providers, especially those in regulated professions including psychology, where there is already extensive regulation and very high professional, educational and ethical standards.
We need a new, clear policy framework which creates the conditions for quality and safety in the NDIS by supporting and empowering providers, not by making it more difficult for psychologists to do their best work with NDIS participants.
Drawing on the results of our recent survey of APS members about their experience with the NDIS, we presented three principles which we believe should guide the review and development of a new Framework. In summary, we believe that a revised Framework must:
- Contain policy strategies which actively and positively promote high-quality and safe practice in NDIS services, rather than just regulating for risk.
- Lead to the (re-)design of regulatory systems (such as the NDIS registration process) to ensure that they are proportionate and fair on NDIS providers – especially those who are already regulated are performing to a high standard.
- Identify and eliminate the administrative burden on providers (including through a ‘sludge audit’ and through close engagement with relevant professions), before imposing any new regulatory requirements.
The APS will continue to engage with the NDIS Review team to advocate for the full and equitable contribution of psychologists in the NDIS.
View Submission