Australian Psychology Society This browser is not supported. Please upgrade your browser.

Volume 30, No 1, June 2019

Let’s assume people are good: Rethinking research in community psychology

Here I argue for a community psychology based on the worth of all people and focus in particular on what that implies for those of us who do research. I discuss a hermeneutics of suspicion and methodolatry as orientations that can obscure the dignity of persons and offer a community psychology informed by humanism (CPh) as an alternative. CPh as outlined here, works from the assumption that people are good and emphasises a hermeneutics of love. Research involves the commitment to serve a community and an iterative process of working alongside that community while trusting, deepening and challenging your perspective as a researcher.  I conclude by giving two examples from my own work and offering five principles researchers may wish to consider if CPh resonates for them.

Download full article (PDF)

Keywords

Community psychology, research, humanism, hermeneutics of love, hermeneutics of suspicion, methodolatry

References

  • Baumeister, R. F., Dale, K. L., & Muraven, M. (2000). Volition and belongingness: Social movements, volition, self-esteem, and the need to belong. In S. Stryker, T. J. Owens & R. W. White (Eds.), Self, Identity, and Social Movements (pp. 239-251). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Brinkmann, S. (2017). Humanism after posthumanism: or qualitative psychology after the “posts”. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 14(2), 109-130. 10.1080/14780887.2017.1282568
  • Carse, J. P. (1986). Finite and Infinite Games. New York: The Free Press.
  • Carse, J. P. (1994). Breakfast at the Victory: The Mysticism of Ordinary Experience. New York: HarperOne.
  • Chamberlain, K. (2000). Methodolatry and Qualitative Health Research. Journal of Health Psychology, 5, 285-296.
  • Cherry, F. (1995). The stubborn particulars of social psychology: Essays on the research process. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Davidson, L. (2000). Philosophical foundations of humanistic psychology. The Humanistic Psychologist, 28(1-3), 7-31.
  • DeRobertis, E. M., & Bland, A. M. (2018). Tapping the humanistic potential of self-determination theory: Awakening to paradox. The Humanistic Psychologist, 46(2), 105-128.
  • Duckett, P., Fryer, D., Lawthom, R., Easpaig, B. N. G., & Radermacher, H. (2013). The good, the bad and the ugly: Searching for critical research in psychology. Qualitative Research Journal, 13(2), 145-153.
  • Evans, S. D., Duckett, P., Lawthom, R., & Kivell, N. (2017). Positioning the critical in community psychology. In M. A. Bond, I. Serrano-García, C. B. Keys & M. Shinn (Eds.), APA Handbook of Community Psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical Foundations, Core Concepts, and Emerging Challenges (pp. 107-127): American Psychological Association.
  • Fine, M. (2018). Just research in contentious times: Widening the methodological imagination. New York, USA: Teachers College Press.
  • Fromm, E. (1957). The art of loving. London, UK: Allen & Unwin.
  • Fromm, E. (1978). To have or to be? London, UK: Jonathan Cape.
  • Fryer, D., & Laing, A. (2008). Community Psychologies: What are they? What could they be? Why does it matter? A Critical Community Psychology Approach. The Australian Community Psychologist, 20(2), 7-15.
  • Grice, J. L., Braun, V., & Wetherell, M. (2017). "What I reckon is, is that like the love you give to your kids they'll give to someone else and so on": Whanaungatanga and mātauranga Māori in practice. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 46(3), 88-97.
  • Gridley, H., & Breen, L. J. (2007). So far and yet so near? Community psychology in Australia. In S. M. Reich, M. Riemer, I. Prilleltensky & M. Montero (Eds.), International community psychology: History and theories (pp. 119-163). New York, USA: Springer.
  • Groot, S., & Hodgetts, D. (2012). Homemaking on the streets and beyond. Community, Work & Family, 15(3), 255-271. 10.1080/13668803.2012.657933
  • Guerin, B., Leugi, G. B., & Thain, A. (2018). Attempting to overcome problems shared by both qualitative and quantitative methodologies: Two hybrid procedures to encourage diverse research. The Australian Community Psychologist, 29(2), 74-90.
  • Harré, N. (2018a). The Infinite Game: How to Live Well Together. Auckland, NZ: Auckland University Press.
  • Harré, N. (2018b). Psychology for a Better World: Working with People to Save the Planet. Auckland: Auckland University Press.
  • Harré, N., Grant, B., Locke, K., & Sturm, S. (2017). The university as an infinite game: Revitalising activism in the academy. Australian Universities' Review, 59(2), 5-13.
  • Harré, N., & Madden, H. (2017). The infinite game: A symbol and workshop for living well together. Ecopsychology, 9(4), 212-224.
  • Harré, N., Madden, H., Brooks, R., & Goodman, J. (2017). Sharing values as a foundation for collective hope. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5(2), 342-366. 10.5964/jspp.v5i2.742
  • Huizinga, J. (1950). Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture. Boston: The Becan Press.
  • Kagan, C., Burton, M., Duckett, P., Lawthom, R., & Siddiquee, A. (2011). Critical Community Psychology. Chichester, UK: BPS Blackwell.
  • Kvale, S. (1992). Psychology and Postmodernism. London, UK: Sage.
  • Manuela, S., & Sibley, C. G. (2013). The Pacific Identity and Wellbeing Scale (PIWBS): A culturally-appropriate self-report measure for Pacific peoples in New Zealand. Social Indicators Research, 112(1), 83-103.
  • Marcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional man. Boston, MA, USA: Beacon Press.
  • May, R. (1969). Love and Will. New York, USA: W.W. Norton.
  • McInerney, R. G. (2016). A hermeneutics of love for community-based, participatiory action research. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 56(3), 263-285.
  • Merton, T. (1965/1979). Love and Living. Orlando, Florida: Harcourt.
  • Moane, G. (2003). Bridging the personal and the political: Practices for a liberation psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31(1/2), 91-101.
  • Montero, M., Sonn, C. C., & Burton, M. (2017). Community Psychology and Liberation Psychology: A creative synergy for an ethical and transformative praxis. In M. A. Bond, I. Serrano-García, C. B. Keys & M. Shinn (Eds.), APA Handbook of Community Psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical Foundations, Core Concepts, and Emerging Challenges (pp. 149-167): American Psychological Association.
  • Moore, S., Neylon, C., Eve, M. P., O’Donnell, D. P., & Pattinson, D. (2017). “Excellence R Us”: university research and the fetishisation of excellence. Palgrave Communications, 3:16105 10.1057/palcomms.2016.105.
  • Muramoto, S. (2011). Humanistic psychology as the quest for the identity of human being. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 51(4), 419-423.
  • Nelson, G., Lavoie, F., & Mitchell, T. (2007). The histories and theories of community psychology in Canada. In S. M. Reich, M. Riemer, I. Prilleltensky & M. Montero (Eds.), International community psychology: History and theories (pp. 13-36). New York, USA: Springer.
  • Nowak, M., & Highfield, R. (2011). Super cooperators: Evolution, altruism and human behaviour. Edinburgh, UK: Cannongate.
  • Rappaport, J. (1977). Community Psychology. New York, USA: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Riger, S. (2017). Feminism and community psychology: Compelling convergences. In M. A. Bond, I. Serrano-García, C. B. Keys & M. Shinn (Eds.), APA Handbook of Community Psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical Foundations, Core Concepts, and Emerging Challenges (pp. 129-147): American Psychological Association.
  • Robbins, B. D. (2016a). The heart of humanistic psychology: Human dignity disclosed through a hermeneutic of love. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 56(3), 223-237.
  • Robbins, B. D. (2016b). Introduction to special issue on community psychology and the hermeneutics of love. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 56(3), 215-222.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic- dialetical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Determination Research (pp. 3-36). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
  • Sarason, S. B. (1974). The psychological sense of community: Prospects for a community psychology. San Franscisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Selig, J. L. (2016). Borne forward ceaselessly into love: A theory of the hermeneutics of love exemplified by Martin Luther King, Jr. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 56(3), 238-262.
  • Serlin, I. (2011). The history and future of humanistic psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 51(4), 428-431.
  • Tudge, C. (2013). Why Genes are Not Selfish and People are Nice. Edinburgh: Floris Books.
  • Unger, R. M. (Writer) & D. Edmonds & N. Warburton (Directors). (2014). Roberto Mangabeira Unger on What is Wrong with the Social Sciences Today, Social Science Bits: Sage. Retrieved from www.socialsciencebites.com
  • The free online text fixer can convert any document to a clean HTML code.

Author

Niki Harré
University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Author biography

Niki Harré is a professor in the School of Psychology at the University of Auckland, where she teaches social and community psychology. She is also the coordinator of a three course module on Sustainability. Her recent research projects have focused on sustainable communities and schools, positive youth development and political activism. In 2007 Niki edited, with Quentin Atkinson, the book Carbon Neutral by 2020: How New Zealanders Can Tackle Climate Change. Her two latest books are The Infinite Game: How to Live Well Together and Psychology for a Better World: Working with People to Save the Planet.

Search

Submit