We are Australia's peak body for international assessments for study or skilled migration. Learn more.
Access thousands of psychologists across Australia
Evidence-based psychological interventions in the treatment of mental disorders: A literature review (5th Ed.)
Psychology's role in transforming women and girls' psychological health
We're here for you — supporting your career, our profession, and serving as your trusted advisor. Click here to renew today.
Join passionate individuals working to improve the lives of Australians through psychology
Monitor progress towards your CPD requirements
Browse 200+ CPD activities developed by Australian psychologists
We are Australia's peak body for international Assessments. Find out how we can help.
Stay up to date with the latest news from the APS
This page requires JavaScript. Your browser currently has JavaScript turned off.
This browser is not supported. Please upgrade your browser.
The APS supports the Commission’s attempts to define systems and processes that minimise their impact on victim/survivors and protect them from additional harm. Given that reliving one’s story is likely to be distressing and potentially re-traumatising to the victim/survivor, this has important implications for the civil litigation process. The APS submission states that systems of redress must ensure that their processes and procedures do not inadvertently expose complainants to further harm.
The APS recommends that consideration be given to alternatives to the court system, including the potential for practices and processes within institutions to better manage allegations of abuse. The APS stresses that what is relevant for all of these matters is to consider how victims may be empowered beyond the helplessness that was part of their traumatic experience.
View submission
Not a member? Join now
Please enter your User ID (APS Membership Number) and last name. A link to reset your password will be emailed to you.
Return to Login