Our renewals portal is undergoing an upgrade. If you experience any issues please contact member services for support. Thank you for your patience as we transition to a new and improved system.

Australian Psychology Society This browser is not supported. Please upgrade your browser.

InPsych 2021 | Vol 43

August Special | Issue 3

Professional practice

A step forward or double-edged sword? Three key professional indemnity risks in telehealth

A step forward or double-edged sword? Three key professional indemnity risks in telehealth

Telehealth may have been around for many years, but it was a global pandemic that catapulted us decades into the future in terms of its adoption. A year on, experts predict that telehealth is here to stay. However, as a psychologist, telehealth may bring with it its own set of risks and complexities which need to be kept in mind. Such complexities may give rise to allegations of professional negligence if not managed appropriately. We explore the three key areas where psychologists may be exposed to professional negligence allegations, and some simple steps that might help to prevent the likelihood of such claims.

Body language

Not having a client sitting in front of you naturally means you are not able to readily observe body language, or other aspects of their physical presence that may indicate the real state of their mental health. The inability to see non-verbal cues means psychologists have had to pay closer attention to other factors, such as tone of voice and facial expressions. Some psychologists are also working around the matter by asking more direct and probing questions of their clients (ab.co/3hlyMCT). And by staying across the latest in best-practice, ethical telehealth etiquette is key to ensure you are well-informed (bit.ly/3wn9KHG).

Regardless of how you address the lack of visual cues involved in conducting a telehealth service, the reality is, there is still a likelihood that a client may misinterpret your advice, or claim your service or treatment using telehealth was not sufficient, leading them to suffer financially or emotionally. While taking due diligence can help prevent the likelihood of such allegations, it is also important to ensure the Professional Indemnity cover you have in place also includes cover for allegations that arise out of such situations.

Privacy implications

Another area in telehealth that may present professional indemnity exposure for psychologists and other health professionals is privacy – both yours and your clients. When conducting a telehealth session, you of course need to ensure the space you’re working in is private, and not use speaker phone, but also consider your clients’ surroundings.

For example, some psychologists have experienced cases where their clients were not able to find a private space in their homes to talk freely. Furthermore, it is important to be conscious of what you say back to your clients, especially if you can sense they may not be in a private location or if they have you on speaker phone.

In addition to physical privacy, another area of concern when it comes to telehealth is cybersecurity. Even if you feel this isn’t a risk for your business, with cybercrime constantly on the rise, the systems you use to contact your clients, conduct telehealth sessions, and store your client information may put you at risk of being targeted by cyber criminals. It’s therefore important to ensure you have adequate security controls in place on your network and computer to ensure you are safeguarding your clients’ personal data. Cyber Insurance is also a wise option for health practitioners who have a digital presence, or use the internet to operate their service (bit.ly/3ypbilY).

Technical difficulties

Any use of technology brings with it the likelihood of technical difficulties, and this is also the case for telehealth services. Technical difficulties such as slow internet connection means there may be times during your session when your client doesn’t hear some parts of what you say, which leads them to misinterpret your advice.

This can again, lead to claims of professional negligence if one your clients feels your advice had a negative impact on their health or life. Even if a client derives this conclusion based on a misunderstanding due to a technical glitch during a telehealth session, once your business has been named in a legal action, costs add up quickly, and the one way forward to rectify the situation may be with appropriate legal representation.

The importance of having the right Professional Indemnity Insurance

While telehealth has undoubtedly provided numerous benefits to the community, even outside of COVID-19, health professionals should not ignore the additional complexities that may lead to claims of professional negligence. It is important for psychologists to also review their insurance cover to ensure that allegations that arise as a result of a telehealth consult are covered under their Professional Indemnity Insurance.

About the author

Aon is a leader in risk and insurance and provides a range of insurance solutions for chiropractors. As the preferred insurance broker to the Australian Psychological Society, Aon is proud to provide cover for APS members and our number of clients continue to grow. If you’d like to find out more about Aon or get a quote, please visit aon.com.au/aps, call 1800 805 191 or email [email protected]

This information is intended to provide general insurance related information only. It is not intended to be comprehensive, nor does it, or should it (under any circumstances) be construed as constituting legal advice. You should seek independent legal or other professional advice before acting or relying on any of the contents of this information. Aon will not be responsible for any loss, damage, cost or expense you or anyone else incurs in reliance on or use of any information contained in this article.

 

References

Disclaimer: Published in InPsych on August 2021. The APS aims to ensure that information published in InPsych is current and accurate at the time of publication. Changes after publication may affect the accuracy of this information. Readers are responsible for ascertaining the currency and completeness of information they rely on, which is particularly important for government initiatives, legislation or best-practice principles which are open to amendment. The information provided in InPsych does not replace obtaining appropriate professional and/or legal advice.